Life, Libations and the Pursuit of Boobs - Latest Comments in Copyright Your Cunt YouTube

Re: Copyright Your Cunt YouTube

Perm — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:30:32 -0000

Follow up...

Re: Copyright Your Cunt YouTube

kriskeimig — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:33:24 -0000

Yeah. I figured out that you were agreeing with me about half way through the reply.

I was all charged up. What do you want me to do. Though I would disagree that the music in my video would be considered a bit for bit copy.

Doesn't really matter either way (although I would love to know my rights better) b/c the video is back up: http://www.youtube.com/watc.... I stated my case to YouTube and they let the video go back up.

Re: Copyright Your Cunt YouTube

Perm — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:48:51 -0000

I was agreeing with you dick-tard.

Also; you could make a mix-tape, or any kind of tape, in high school because you were going digital->analog or analog->analog. That is not what we would now consider a bit for bit "copy".

DMCA is teh geigh.

Perm out.

Re: Copyright Your Cunt YouTube

kriskeimig — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:59:16 -0000

Ok. But copyright laws were created to protect the owner of a piece of content/media. The protection was put in place so that others could not come by and claim that said piece of content/media was theirs and make a living off of the stolen material. This basic law also extends into distribution rights...

This is why you were able to make a mixtape for your girlfriend when you were in high school and not get arrested, however, if you made a copy of an album and sold it then you would be arrested. This seems to make sense to me; if I use the content/media for profit then I should pay for the rights to do so - if not then fuck off.

The DMCA extends original copyright laws even further and the act doesn't give too much wiggle room on the part of the consumer.

Though... maybe you were agreeing with me. I couldn't tell by the tone of your comment.

Re: Copyright Your Cunt YouTube

Perm — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:31:03 -0000

Your video was 5 minutes long. Probably 2 minutes of it featuring one piece of the song. I'm no fancy big city lawyer; but I would say that falls under "fair use". You should really tell YouTube to go scissor.